Template:Format footnotes: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (Protected "Template:Format footnotes": semi-protecting highly-visible templates in response to recent template-space vandalism ([Edit=Require autoconfirmed or confirmed access] (indefinite) [Move=Require autoconfirmed or confirmed acces...) |
m (1 revision imported: Wikipedia Article Message Templates 31-40) |
(No difference)
|
Latest revision as of 02:32, 25 October 2018
This article includes inline citations, but they are not properly formatted. (November 2024) (Learn how and when to remove this template message) |
Usage
Use {{Format footnotes|date=November 2024}}
to alert editors to articles with improperly formatted or non-formatted citations.
- This template will add the page to Category:Articles needing footnote reformatting and Category:Articles covered by WikiProject Wikify.
- A bot will add the date for you at a later time if you forgot.
Example
Use in an article with citations like:
Australia has a government Australian Government.
or
Australia has a governmentsee footnote 1
A standard, correct way of formatting this citation would be:
Australia has a government (Australian Government Press Agency, 2009).
or:
Australia has a government.[1]
References
- ↑ Australian Government Press Agency (25 November 2009). "Australian Government". Retrieved 25 November 2009.
See also
The above documentation is transcluded from Template:Format footnotes/doc. (edit | history) Editors can experiment in this template's sandbox (create | mirror) and testcases (create) pages. Please add categories to the /doc subpage. Subpages of this template. |